You’ve probably been seeing this making the rounds in the news.
A lost Syriac manuscript that depicts Jesus and Mary Magdalene?
In a word:
Robert Cargill sums it all up as good as I could myself here. Read his review, and then you honestly won’t have to read the book. In fact, just read the following paragraph. It sums it up perfectly:
The text in question is neither “lost” nor a “gospel”, and the allegorical reading of the Syriac version of Joseph and Aseneth is little more than a wishful hope that it would be so, employing little more than name substitution and a desire to prove The DaVinci Code true. Absolutely no scholar will take this book seriously. It will not change Christianity. It will not change biblical scholarship. It’s just Simcha doing what he does best: direct-to-the-public pseudoscholarship just in time for Christmas.
One thought on “Another “Lost Gospel”? Naw.”
Thank you! The truth is so refreshing. I got pricked big time when Diane Sawyer suggested this.